A few questions
I am probably going to catch flack just for asking the questions, but here goes:
1. Why does nearly everybody leave out the fact that Joint Chief's of Staff Chairman General Peter Pace called adultery immoral before he said homosexuality was immoral?
2. Why doesn't an organized group of adulterers rise up and demand an apology and Pace's dismissal?
3. Why does America care more about what people think--and occasionally say--more than they care about what they actually do?
In case you are not sure what I am talking about, a quick recap: This past week Gen. Pace discussed the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays in the armed forces with the Chicago Tribune. In the course of that interview he said he believed homosexuality was immoral. Here is the entire quote:
"My upbringing is such that I believe that there are certain things,
certain types of conduct, that are immoral. I believe that military members who
sleep with other military members wives are immoral in their conduct and that we
should not tolerate that. I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are
immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts."
So that is what he said. I have my opinions--of course--concerning the questions I posed above, but I will probably wait until a later post to address them.
1 comment:
I think America cares a lot about what others say and think about them. I see a fading sense of originality when I look at some Americans. Also, the "united we stand" thing is overdone in the US. Maybe it is true or maybe people just stand as one bg group irrespective of the fact that may have different opinions.
I might be wrong about this. This is just my observation.
Post a Comment